MedCalcHub stores your favorites, history, and saved calculations locally in your browser using localStorage. This data never leaves your device.
Optional advertising, when enabled, may use third-party cookies or similar technologies. You can accept or reject advertising below.
Objective prognostic assessment of liver function using serum albumin and bilirubin. Primarily validated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for stratifying prognosis and guiding treatment decisions.
ALBI = (log10(bilirubin [µmol/L]) × −0.372) + (albumin [g/L] × −0.198) + 4.90
Grade I (≤ −2.60)
The ALBI score was published by Johnson et al. in 2014 (J Clin Oncol 32:3378-3386) as an objective alternative to the Child-Pugh score for assessing liver function in HCC. Unlike Child-Pugh, ALBI uses only two objective laboratory values (albumin and bilirubin), eliminating the subjective components of ascites, encephalopathy, and nutritional status. ALBI has been validated in multiple international cohorts and is increasingly incorporated into HCC staging systems and treatment algorithms.
Specialty
Internal MedicineCategory
GastroenterologyDifficulty
Basic
Estimated Time
30 seconds
Version
1.0
Last Updated
2026-08
Formula
Keywords
Normal Range
Grade I (≤ −2.60)
| Classification | Range |
|---|---|
Grade I (best prognosis) | ≤ −2.60 |
Grade II (intermediate prognosis) | −2.60 to −1.39 |
Grade III (worst prognosis) | > −1.39 |
Objective prognostic assessment of liver function using serum albumin and bilirubin. Primarily validated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for stratifying prognosis and guiding treatment decisions.
ALBI Grade I indicates preserved liver function with favorable prognosis. Grade III indicates severe liver dysfunction with poor prognosis. ALBI is objective and reproducible, eliminating the subjective components of Child-Pugh scoring.
ALBI provides an objective, reproducible alternative to Child-Pugh for liver function assessment in HCC. It uses only two laboratory values and has been validated in multiple international cohorts, making it increasingly adopted in HCC staging systems.
An HCC patient with bilirubin 25 µmol/L and albumin 38 g/L.
Inputs:
ALBI = (log10(25) × −0.372) + (38 × −0.198) + 4.90 = (1.398 × −0.372) + (−7.524) + 4.90 = −0.520 + (−7.524) + 4.90 = −3.14 (Grade I — best prognosis).
The ALBI (Albumin-Bilirubin) score is an objective prognostic tool for assessing liver function using only serum albumin and bilirubin. It was developed as a more reproducible alternative to the Child-Pugh score, eliminating subjective components like ascites and encephalopathy grading.
ALBI Grade I (≤ −2.60): Best prognosis, ~25% 1-year mortality. ALBI Grade II (−2.60 to −1.39): Intermediate prognosis, ~50% 1-year mortality. ALBI Grade III (> −1.39): Worst prognosis, ~75% 1-year mortality. These were derived from HCC patient cohorts.
ALBI uses only two objective lab values (albumin and bilirubin), while Child-Pugh includes subjective components (ascites, encephalopathy, nutritional status). ALBI is more reproducible and has been shown to predict outcomes similarly or better than Child-Pugh in HCC patients.
ALBI was primarily validated in HCC patients. While it may provide useful prognostic information in other liver diseases (cirrhosis, hepatitis), its use outside HCC should be interpreted with caution as it has not been as extensively validated in these populations.
The ALBI formula uses bilirubin in µmol/L (SI units; multiply mg/dL by 17.1 to convert) and albumin in g/L (multiply g/dL by 10 to convert).
Disclaimer: This calculator is intended for educational and clinical decision support. ALBI score should be used as part of comprehensive HCC assessment, not as a standalone tool for treatment decisions.
Objective, reproducible liver function assessment in HCC patients.
Primarily validated in HCC; does not account for portal hypertension or encephalopathy.
Comprehensive liver function assessment including clinical features (ascites, encephalopathy).
Includes subjective components; less reproducible than ALBI.
Short-term mortality prediction and transplant prioritization.
Focused on short-term prognosis rather than overall liver function classification.